Arguing About Goals: The Diminishing Scope of Legal Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Towards Alternative Approaches to Reasoning About Goals
Agent-oriented programming languages have gone a long way in the level of sophistication offered to programmers, and there has also been much progress in tools to support multi-agent systems development using such languages. However, much work is still required in mechanisms that can reduce the burden, typically placed on programmers, of ensuring that agents behave rationally, hence being effec...
متن کاملReasoning about Attack Goals for Cyber Resilience
This paper describes our approach to anticipating and recognizing potential cyber threats in order to provide timely responses to those threats. Our approach anticipates attacks on distributed systems by generating a diverse set of attack plans on key system components and then determining the probabilities that these attacks may threaten those components or others that are stepping stones to t...
متن کاملCommon Knowledge in Legal Reasoning about Evidence
It is shown how tools of argument analysis currently being developed in artificial intelligence can be applied to legal judgments about evidence based on common knowledge. Chains of reasoning containing generalizations and implicit premises that express common knowledge are modeled using argument diagrams and argumentation schemes. A controversial thesis is argued for. It is the thesis that suc...
متن کاملArguing About Firewall Policy
In this paper, we present a new framework to analyze firewall policy by using argumentation. At the core of this new idea is extending firewall rules with the concept of “reasons” and arguing about the reasons, not the rules. Depending on how the reasons are designed, the resulting framework can be useful in a number of ways: new anomalies in a firewall policy can be identified while, at the sa...
متن کاملArguing About Planning Alternatives
In discourse processing, two major problems are understanding the underlying connections between succe~ive dialog utterances and deciding on the content of a coherent dialog response. Thin paper presents a computational model of these tasks for a restricted class of argumentative dialogs. In these dialogs, each response presents a belief that justifies or contradicts another belief presented or...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Argumentation
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0920-427X,1572-8374
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-009-9172-9